Exponential utility maximization in small/large financial markets
Pub. online: 23 January 2025
Type: Research Article
Open Access
Received
13 June 2024
13 June 2024
Revised
15 October 2024
15 October 2024
Accepted
23 December 2024
23 December 2024
Published
23 January 2025
23 January 2025
Abstract
Obtaining a utility-maximizing optimal portfolio in a closed form is a challenging issue when the return vector follows a more general distribution than the normal one. In this paper, for markets based on finitely many assets, a closed-form expression is given for optimal portfolios that maximize an exponential utility function when the return vector follows normal mean-variance mixture models. Especially, the used approach expresses the closed-form solution in terms of the Laplace transformation of the mixing distribution of the normal mean-variance mixture model and no distributional assumptions on the mixing distribution are made.
Also considered are large financial markets based on normal mean-variance mixture models, and it is shown that the optimal exponential utilities in small markets converge to the optimal exponential utility in the large financial market. This shows, in particular, that to reach the best utility level investors need to diversify their investments to include infinitely many assets into their portfolio, and with portfolios based on only finitely many assets they will never be able to reach the optimum level of utility.
References
Birge, J.R., Bedoya, L.C.: Portfolio optimization under a generalized hyperbolic skewed t distribution and exponential utility. Quant. Finance 16, 1019–1036 (2016). MR3516137. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2015.1113307
Birge, J.R., Bedoya, L.C.: Portfolio optimization under generalized hyperbolic distribution: Optimal allocation, performance and tail behavior. Quant. Finance 21(2), (2020). MR4201451. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2020.1762913
Bondesson, L.: A remarkable property of generalized gamma convolutions. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 78, 321–333 (1988). MR0949176. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334198
Carassus, L., Rásonyi, M.: Risk-neutral pricing for arbitrage pricing theory. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 186(1), 248–263 (2020). MR4119506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-020-01699-6
Carassus, L., Rásonyi, M.: From small markets to big markets. Banach Cent. Publ. 122, 41–52 (2021). MR4276003. https://doi.org/10.4064/bc122-3
Hellmich, M., Kassberger, S.: Efficient and robust portfolio optimization in the multivariate generalized hyperbolic framework. Quant. Finance 11(10), 1503–1516 (2011). MR2851086. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680903280483
Hu, W., Kercheval, A.N.: Portfolio optimization for student t and skewed t returns. Quant. Finance 10(1), 91–105 (2010). MR2605909. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680902814225
James, L.F., Boynette, B., Yor, M.: Generalized gamma convolutions, dirichlet means, thorin measures, with explicit examples. Probab. Surv. 5, 346–415 (2008). MR2476736. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-PS118
Kwak, M., Pirvu, T.A.: Cumulative prospect theory with generalized hyperbolic skewed t distribution. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 9, 54–89 (2018). MR3746506. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1093550
Madan, D., Yor, M.: Representing the cgmy and meixner lévy processes as time changed brownian motions. J. Comput. Finance 12(1), 27–47 (2008). MR2504899. https://doi.org/10.21314/JCF.2008.181
Monroe, I.: Process that can be embedded in brownian motion. Ann. Probab. 6, 42–56 (1978). MR0455113. https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176995609
Nolan, J.P.: Univariate Stable Distributions. Models for Heavy Tailed Data, (2020). MR4230105. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52915-4
Rásonyi, M.: Arbitrage pricing theory and risk-neutral measures. Decis. Econ. Finance 27, 109–123 (2004). MR2104637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-004-0047-0
Ross., S.A.: The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. J. Econ. Theory 13, 341–360 (1976). MR0429063. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90046-6
Wissem, J., Thomas, S.: Further examples of ggc and hcm densities. Bernoulli 19(5A), 1818–1838 (2013). MR3129035. https://doi.org/10.3150/12-BEJ431