Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications logo


  • Help
Login Register

  1. Home
  2. To appear
  3. Scaling limits for the discretization er ...

Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications

Submit your article Information Become a Peer-reviewer
  • Article info
  • Full article
  • Related articles
  • More
    Article info Full article Related articles

Scaling limits for the discretization error of a Brownian stochastic integral
Yan Dolinsky  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.15559/26-VMSTA312
Pub. online: 4 November 2026      Type: Research Article      Open accessOpen Access

Received
15 June 2026
Accepted
19 October 2026
Published
4 November 2026

Abstract

In this note, we derive a large-deviation-type scaling limit for the discretization error of a Brownian stochastic integral. Somewhat surprisingly, and to the best of our knowledge, this result has not been previously obtained in the literature.

1 Introduction and the main result

Let $W={({W_{t}})_{t\ge 0}}$ be a standard one-dimensional Brownian motion defined on a probability space $(\Omega ,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})$ and endowed with its augmented natural filtration ${({\mathcal{F}_{t}})_{t\ge 0}}$.
The well-known Martingale Representation Theorem (see [17, Section 4]) states that, for a measurable function $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ such that $f({W_{1}})\in {L_{2}}$, we have
\[f({W_{1}})=u(0,0)+{\int _{0}^{1}}{u_{x}}(t,{W_{t}})\hspace{1.67pt}d{W_{t}},\]
where $u=u(t,x)$ is the unique solution, under suitable growth conditions, of the heat equation
\[{u_{t}}+\frac{1}{2}{u_{\mathit{xx}}}=0,\hspace{20.0pt}u(1,x)=f(x),\]
and is given by
\[u(t,x):=\mathbb{E}\Bigl[f(x+{W_{1-t}})\Bigr]=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi }}{\int _{\mathbb{R}}}f\Bigl(x+\sqrt{1-t}\hspace{1.67pt}y\Bigr){e^{-{y^{2}}/2}}\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dy}.\]
From the point of view of mathematical finance, the Martingale Representation Theorem can be viewed as a perfect replication result, and the process
\[{\Bigl({u_{x}}(t,{W_{t}})\Bigr)_{t\in [0,1)}}\]
is the corresponding delta-hedging strategy. In real market conditions, however, portfolio rebalancing can occur only at discrete times. Roughly speaking, as the frequency of rebalancing increases and the discrete hedging strategy approaches continuous rebalancing, the corresponding portfolio values converge to those of the continuously rebalanced portfolio.
Before formulating our main result, we need some preparation. Introduce the function
\[\Psi (c):=\frac{-c-\log (1-c)}{2},\hspace{20.0pt}c\lt 1.\]
Observe that, for a standard normal random variable $Z\sim N(0,1)$,
(1)
\[\mathbb{E}\Biggl[\exp \Biggl(\frac{c}{2}\Bigl({Z^{2}}-1\Bigr)\Biggr)\Biggr]={e^{\Psi (c)}},\hspace{20.0pt}\forall c\lt 1.\]
We now arrive at our main result, which will be proved in the next section.
Theorem 1.
Let $f\in {C^{3}}(\mathbb{R})$ be such that
\[-\mathrm{\infty }\lt \inf \limits_{x\in \mathbb{R}}{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)\le \sup \limits_{x\in \mathbb{R}}{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)\lt 1,\]
and suppose that ${f^{\prime \prime \prime }}$ is Lipschitz continuous.
Set
\[{S_{n}}:=f({W_{1}})-u(0,0)-{\sum \limits_{k=0}^{n-1}}{u_{x}}\Biggl(\frac{k}{n},{W_{\frac{k}{n}}}\Biggr)({W_{\frac{k+1}{n}}}-{W_{\frac{k}{n}}}),\hspace{20.0pt}n\in \mathbb{N},\]
and define $g:[0,1]\to {\mathbb{R}_{+}}$ by
\[g(t):=\sup \limits_{x\in \mathbb{R}}\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)\Bigr).\]
Then g is a continuous function and
\[\lim \limits_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\frac{1}{n}\log \mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{\hspace{1.67pt}n{S_{n}}}}\Bigr]={\int _{0}^{1}}g(t)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}.\]
Although discrete-time hedging in the Brownian setting has been studied extensively, the existing literature has focused primarily on the approximation of hedging strategies and stochastic integrals. The convergence of discrete-time delta hedging on equidistant grids was analyzed in [1, 15, 16], while [9, 12, 14, 11] considered more general deterministic discretization schemes. The connection between fractional smoothness of the payoff and ${L_{p}}$-approximation of stochastic integrals, including approximation along equidistant, adapted, and certain random time nets, was studied in [13]. The papers [10, 7, 8, 3] further investigated discretization schemes based on random stopping times.
These works are concerned with discretization errors under a fixed preference specification. By contrast, our analysis is carried out in a large-deviations regime induced by an exponential scaling of the risk-aversion parameter and is a natural continuation of the papers [4, 5], which investigated the following question: if an investor is allowed to rebalance only on an equidistant grid of n trading times, what is the limiting behavior, as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$, under exponential utility with risk-aversion parameter n? The corresponding asymptotically optimal rebalancing strategy is characterized by a nonlinear PDE that does not admit an explicit solution.
In the present paper, we analyze the same scaling regime but replace the asymptotically optimal rebalancing strategy with the simpler strategy obtained by directly discretizing the continuous-time delta hedge.
The assumption
\[\sup \limits_{x\in \mathbb{R}}{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)\lt 1\]
is natural for ensuring that the scaling limit is finite, and it was also imposed in [4, 5]. To gain some intuition, consider
\[f(x)=\frac{1}{2}{x^{2}}.\]
Then
\[{S_{n}}=\frac{1}{2}\Biggl({\sum \limits_{k=0}^{n-1}}{({W_{\frac{k+1}{n}}}-{W_{\frac{k}{n}}})^{2}}-1\Biggr),\]
and therefore
\[\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{n{S_{n}}}}\Bigr]=\mathrm{\infty }\]
for all n.

2 Proof of Theorem 1

Given a function $H:[0,1]\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$, we say that H is Lipschitz continuous if there exists $L\lt \mathrm{\infty }$ such that
\[\Bigl|H(t,x)-H(s,y)\Bigr|\le L\Bigl(|t-s|+|x-y|\Bigr),\hspace{20.0pt}(t,x),(s,y)\in [0,1]\times \mathbb{R}.\]
Proof.
We start with some preparations. For $n\in \mathbb{N}$ and $j=0,1,\dots ,n-1$, let
\[{I_{j}^{n}}=u\Biggl(\frac{j+1}{n},{W_{\frac{j+1}{n}}}\Biggr)-u\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr)-{u_{x}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr)({W_{\frac{j+1}{n}}}-{W_{\frac{j}{n}}})\]
and
\[{Z_{j}^{n}}:=\sqrt{n}({W_{\frac{j+1}{n}}}-{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}).\]
Set
\[a:=\sup \limits_{x\in \mathbb{R}}{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)\lt 1,\hspace{20.0pt}b:=\frac{1}{2}\sup \limits_{x\in \mathbb{R}}\Bigl|{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)\Bigr|.\]
Then
\[{u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)\le a,\hspace{20.0pt}\Bigl|{u_{t}}(t,x)\Bigr|=\frac{1}{2}\Bigl|{u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)\Bigr|\le b,\hspace{20.0pt}(t,x)\in [0,1]\times \mathbb{R}.\]
Clearly, for all $n\in \mathbb{N}$ and $j=0,1,...,n-1$ we have
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle {I_{j}^{n}}& \displaystyle =u\Biggl(\frac{j+1}{n},{W_{\frac{j+1}{n}}}\Biggr)-u\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j+1}{n}}}\Biggr)\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+u\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}+\frac{{Z_{j}^{n}}}{\sqrt{n}}\Biggr)-u\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr)-{u_{x}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr)\frac{{Z_{j}^{n}}}{\sqrt{n}}.\end{array}\]
By the fundamental theorem of calculus, for the first difference we have
(2)
\[u\Biggl(\frac{j+1}{n},{W_{\frac{j+1}{n}}}\Biggr)-u\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j+1}{n}}}\Biggr)={\int _{0}^{1/n}}{u_{t}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n}+s,{W_{\frac{j+1}{n}}}\Biggr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{ds}.\]
For the second difference, the one-dimensional Taylor formula with integral remainder,
\[F(x+h)-F(x)-{F^{\prime }}(x)h={h^{2}}{\int _{0}^{1}}(1-r){F^{\prime \prime }}(x+\mathit{rh})\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dr},\]
applied to $F(x):=u(\frac{j}{n},x)$ and $h:=\frac{{Z_{j}^{n}}}{\sqrt{n}}$, gives
(3)
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}& \displaystyle u\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}+\frac{{Z_{j}^{n}}}{\sqrt{n}}\Biggr)-u\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr)-{u_{x}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr)\frac{{Z_{j}^{n}}}{\sqrt{n}}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}=\frac{{|{Z_{j}^{n}}|^{2}}}{n}{\int _{0}^{1}}(1-r){u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}+r\frac{{Z_{j}^{n}}}{\sqrt{n}}\Biggr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dr}.\end{array}\]
Since, by Lemma 1, ${u_{t}}$ and ${u_{\mathit{xx}}}$ are Lipschitz continuous on $[0,1]\times \mathbb{R}$, combining (2) and (3) we obtain that there exists a constant $\hat{L}\gt 0$ such that, for all $n\ge 2$ and $j=0,1,\dots ,n-1$,
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}& \displaystyle \Biggl|n{I_{j}^{n}}-{u_{t}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr)-\frac{1}{2}{u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr){\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr|\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}\le \hat{L}\Biggl(\frac{1}{n}+\frac{|{Z_{j}^{n}}|}{\sqrt{n}}+\frac{{|{Z_{j}^{n}}|^{3}}}{\sqrt{n}}\Biggr).\end{array}\]
In particular, using ${u_{t}}=-{u_{\mathit{xx}}}/2$ and increasing $\hat{L}$ if necessary, for all $n\ge 2$,
(4)
\[\Biggl|n{I_{j}^{n}}-\frac{1}{2}{u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr)\Bigl({\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|^{2}}-1\Bigr)\Biggr|\le \frac{\hat{L}}{\log n}\hspace{10.0pt}\text{on the event}\hspace{2.5pt}\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|\le {\Biggl(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n}\Biggr)^{1/3}}.\]
Also we observe that by applying (2), (3) and the bounds $|{u_{t}}|\le b$ and ${u_{\mathit{xx}}}\le a$ we have
(5)
\[n{I_{j}^{n}}\le b+\frac{a}{2}{\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|^{2}},\hspace{10.0pt}n\in \mathbb{N}.\]
We finish the preparations by noting that since ${u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)\le a\lt 1$ for all $(t,x)\in [0,1]\times \mathbb{R}$, and Ψ is Lipschitz continuous on $(-\mathrm{\infty },a]$, Lemma 1 implies that $\Psi ({u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x))$ is Lipschitz continuous on $[0,1]\times \mathbb{R}$. Hence, g is also Lipschitz continuous.
We now divide the remainder of the proof of Theorem 1 into two steps.
Step I. In this step, we show the upper bound
\[\limsup \limits_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\frac{1}{n}\log \Bigl(\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{\hspace{1.67pt}n{S_{n}}}}\Bigr]\Bigr)\le {\int _{0}^{1}}g(t)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}.\]
Choose $n\in \mathbb{N}$. Clearly, ${S_{n}}={\sum _{j=0}^{n-1}}{I_{j}^{n}}$.
Thus, to complete the proof of the upper bound, it suffices to show that there exists a constant $L\gt 0$ such that, for all $n\ge 2$ and $j=0,1,\dots ,n-1$,
(6)
\[\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{\hspace{1.67pt}n{I_{j}^{n}}}}\Big|{\mathcal{F}_{j/n}}\Bigr]\le {e^{\frac{L}{\log n}+g(\frac{j}{n})}}+\frac{2{e^{b}}{(\log n)^{1/3}}}{\sqrt{2\pi }(1-a){n^{1/6}}}\exp \Biggl(-\frac{(1-a){n^{1/3}}}{2{(\log n)^{2/3}}}\Biggr).\]
Indeed, (6) implies that for every $\epsilon \gt 0$ and all sufficiently large n,
\[\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{\hspace{1.67pt}n{I_{j}^{n}}}}\Big|{\mathcal{F}_{j/n}}\Bigr]\le {e^{\epsilon +g(\frac{j}{n})}},\hspace{20.0pt}j=0,1,\dots ,n-1.\]
Hence, by the tower property of conditional expectation,
\[\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{\hspace{1.67pt}n{\sum _{j=0}^{n-1}}{I_{j}^{n}}}}\Bigr]\le {e^{\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{n\epsilon }+{\sum _{j=0}^{n-1}}g(\frac{j}{n})}}.\]
Since g is continuous,
\[\limsup \limits_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\frac{1}{n}\log \Bigl(\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{\hspace{1.67pt}n{\sum _{j=0}^{n-1}}{I_{j}^{n}}}}\Bigr]\Bigr)\le \epsilon +{\int _{0}^{1}}g(t)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}.\]
Since $\epsilon \gt 0$ was arbitrary, we obtain the desired upper bound.
It remains to prove (6). Fix j and define the event
\[{A_{j}^{n}}=\Biggl\{\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|\le {\Biggl(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n}\Biggr)^{1/3}}\Biggr\}.\]
We split the exponential according to the disjoint events ${A_{j}^{n}}$ and ${({A_{j}^{n}})^{c}}$. Applying (4) on ${A_{j}^{n}}$ and (5) on its complement gives
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle {e^{n{I_{j}^{n}}}}& \displaystyle ={e^{n{I_{j}^{n}}}}{\mathbf{1}_{{A_{j}^{n}}}}+{e^{n{I_{j}^{n}}}}{\mathbf{1}_{{({A_{j}^{n}})^{c}}}}\\ {} & \displaystyle \le \exp \Biggl(\frac{1}{2}{u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{j/n}}\Biggr)\Bigl({\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|^{2}}-1\Bigr)+\frac{\hat{L}}{\log n}\Biggr){\mathbf{1}_{{A_{j}^{n}}}}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+\exp \Biggl(b+\frac{a}{2}{\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr){\mathbf{1}_{{({A_{j}^{n}})^{c}}}}.\end{array}\]
We now take conditional expectations and bound the first term by dropping its indicator.
Since ${Z_{j}^{n}}\sim N(0,1)$ is independent of ${\mathcal{F}_{j/n}}$, we obtain
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle \mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{\hspace{1.67pt}n{I_{j}^{n}}}}\Big|{\mathcal{F}_{j/n}}\Bigr]& \displaystyle \le \exp \Biggl(\frac{\hat{L}}{\log n}\Biggr)\mathbb{E}\Biggl[\exp \Biggl(\frac{1}{2}{u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr)\Bigl({\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|^{2}}-1\Bigr)\Biggr)\Bigg|{\mathcal{F}_{j/n}}\Biggr]\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+\mathbb{E}\Biggl[\exp \Biggl(b+\frac{a}{2}{\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr){\mathbf{1}_{\{|{Z_{j}^{n}}|\gt {(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n})^{1/3}}\}}}\Biggr]\\ {} & \displaystyle =\exp \Biggl(\frac{\hat{L}}{\log n}+\Psi \Biggl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Biggl(\frac{j}{n},{W_{\frac{j}{n}}}\Biggr)\Biggr)\Biggr)\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+\mathbb{E}\Biggl[\exp \Biggl(b+\frac{a}{2}{\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr){\mathbf{1}_{\{|{Z_{j}^{n}}|\gt {(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n})^{1/3}}\}}}\Biggr].\end{array}\]
Finally, by a direct estimate for the standard normal variable ${Z_{j}^{n}}$,
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}& \displaystyle \mathbb{E}\Biggl[\exp \Biggl(b+\frac{a}{2}{\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr){\mathbf{1}_{\{|{Z_{j}^{n}}|\gt {(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n})^{1/3}}\}}}\Biggr]\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}=\frac{2{e^{b}}}{\sqrt{2\pi }}{\int _{{(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n})^{1/3}}}^{\mathrm{\infty }}}\exp \Biggl(-\frac{1-a}{2}{z^{2}}\Biggr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dz}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}\le \frac{2{e^{b}}{(\log n)^{1/3}}}{\sqrt{2\pi }(1-a){n^{1/6}}}\exp \Biggl(-\frac{(1-a){n^{1/3}}}{2{(\log n)^{2/3}}}\Biggr).\end{array}\]
This yields (6) and completes the first step.
Step II. Fix $\epsilon \gt 0$. By Lemma 2, choose a continuous, piecewise-linear function $h:[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}$, with $h(0)=0$, such that
\[{\int _{0}^{1}}\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Bigl(t,h(t)\Bigr)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}\ge {\int _{0}^{1}}g(t)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}-\epsilon .\]
Choose $\delta \gt 0$ such that, for all $t\in [0,1]$ and $x,y\in \mathbb{R}$,
\[|x-y|\lt \delta \hspace{10.0pt}\Longrightarrow \hspace{10.0pt}\Bigl|\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)\Bigr)-\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,y)\Bigr)\Bigr|\lt \epsilon .\]
For $n\ge 2$, retain the notation ${I_{j}^{n}}$, ${Z_{j}^{n}}$ from the preparations and set
\[\begin{array}{c}\displaystyle {r_{n}}={\Biggl(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n}\Biggr)^{1/3}},\hspace{20.0pt}{F_{n}}=\Biggl\{\max \limits_{0\le j\lt n}\Bigl|{Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr|\le {r_{n}}\Biggr\},\\ {} \displaystyle {E_{n}}=\Biggl\{\max \limits_{0\le j\le n}\Bigl|{W_{j/n}}-h(j/n)\Bigr|\lt \delta \Biggr\}.\end{array}\]
The local remainder estimate (4) holds on ${F_{n}}$. Consequently,
\[\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{n{S_{n}}}}\Bigr]\ge {e^{-\hat{L}n/\log n}}\hspace{1.67pt}\mathbb{E}\Biggl[\exp \Biggl({\sum \limits_{j=0}^{n-1}}\frac{1}{2}{u_{\mathit{xx}}}(j/n,{W_{j/n}})\Bigl({\Bigl({Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr)^{2}}-1\Bigr)\Biggr){\mathbf{1}_{{F_{n}}}}\Biggr].\]
Define
\[{c_{j}^{n}}={u_{\mathit{xx}}}(j/n,{W_{j/n}}),\hspace{20.0pt}{D_{j}^{n}}=\exp \Bigl(\frac{1}{2}{c_{j}^{n}}\Bigl({\Bigl({Z_{j}^{n}}\Bigr)^{2}}-1\Bigr)-\Psi \Bigl({c_{j}^{n}}\Bigr)\Bigr).\]
Then set
\[\frac{d{\mathbb{Q}_{n}}}{d\mathbb{P}}={\prod \limits_{j=0}^{n-1}}{D_{j}^{n}}.\]
By (1), $\mathbb{E}[{D_{j}^{n}}|{\mathcal{F}_{j/n}}]=1$; successive conditioning therefore shows that this density has expectation one. Changing measure and then restricting to ${E_{n}}$ gives
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle \mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{n{S_{n}}}}\Bigr]& \displaystyle \ge {e^{-\hat{L}n/\log n}}{\mathbb{E}_{{\mathbb{Q}_{n}}}}\Bigl[{e^{{\sum _{j=0}^{n-1}}\Psi ({c_{j}^{n}})}}{\mathbf{1}_{{F_{n}}}}\Bigr]\\ {} & \displaystyle \ge \exp \Biggl({\sum \limits_{j=0}^{n-1}}\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Bigl(j/n,h(j/n)\Bigr)\Bigr)-\mathit{n\epsilon }-\frac{\hat{L}n}{\log n}\Biggr){\mathbb{Q}_{n}}({E_{n}}\cap {F_{n}}).\end{array}\]
We prove that ${\liminf _{n}}{\mathbb{Q}_{n}}({E_{n}}\cap {F_{n}})\gt 0$.
Write $m={\inf _{x\in \mathbb{R}}}{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)\gt -\mathrm{\infty }$ and retain $a={\sup _{x\in \mathbb{R}}}{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)\lt 1$. Since ${u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)=\mathbb{E}[{f^{\prime \prime }}(x+{W_{1-t}})]$, we have $m\le {u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)\le a$. Define
\[\sigma (t,x)={\Bigl(1-{u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)\Bigr)^{-1/2}},\hspace{20.0pt}\underline{\sigma }={(1-m)^{-1/2}},\hspace{20.0pt}\overline{\sigma }={(1-a)^{-1/2}}.\]
Then $0\lt \underline{\sigma }\le \sigma (t,x)\le \overline{\sigma }\lt \mathrm{\infty }$. If ${L_{q}}$ is a Lipschitz constant for ${u_{\mathit{xx}}}$ with respect to the Euclidean metric, the mean value theorem gives
(7)
\[{\Bigl|\sigma (t,x)-\sigma (s,y)\Bigr|^{2}}\le {K_{\sigma }^{2}}\Bigl({|t-s|^{2}}+{|x-y|^{2}}\Bigr),\hspace{20.0pt}{K_{\sigma }}=\frac{{L_{q}}}{2{(1-a)^{3/2}}}.\]
Successive conditioning of the factors ${D_{k}^{n}}$ with $k\gt j$ shows that the conditional density of ${Z_{j}^{n}}$ under ${\mathbb{Q}_{n}}$, given ${\mathcal{F}_{j/n}}$, is
\[z\longmapsto \frac{\sqrt{1-{c_{j}^{n}}}}{\sqrt{2\pi }}\exp \Biggl(-\frac{1-{c_{j}^{n}}}{2}{z^{2}}\Biggr).\]
Indeed, this density is the standard normal density multiplied by $\exp ({c_{j}^{n}}({z^{2}}-1)/2-\Psi ({c_{j}^{n}}))$. Thus, conditionally on ${\mathcal{F}_{j/n}}$, ${Z_{j}^{n}}$ is centered normal with variance ${\sigma ^{2}}(j/n,{W_{j/n}})$. The Gaussian tail bound and the union bound yield
\[{\mathbb{Q}_{n}}\Bigl({F_{n}^{c}}\Bigr)\le 2n\exp \Biggl(-\frac{{r_{n}^{2}}}{2\overline{{\sigma ^{2}}}}\Biggr)=2n\exp \Biggl(-\frac{(1-a){n^{1/3}}}{2{(\log n)^{2/3}}}\Biggr)\longrightarrow 0.\]
To apply Corollary 7.4.2 of [6], we include time in the state. Extend σ to ${\mathbb{R}^{2}}$ by $\tilde{\sigma }(s,x)=\sigma (\max (0,\min (s,1)),x)$. The extension is bounded and Lipschitz. For $z=(s,x)$, let ${\mu _{n}}(z,\cdot )$ be the law of $z+{H_{n}}(z)$, where
\[{H_{n}}(z)=\Biggl(\frac{1}{n},\frac{\tilde{\sigma }(z)}{\sqrt{n}}Z\Biggr),\hspace{20.0pt}Z\sim N(0,1),\hspace{20.0pt}\tilde{\sigma }(z)=\tilde{\sigma }(s,x).\]
Under ${\mathbb{Q}_{n}}$, the chain ${(j/n,{W_{j/n}})_{j=0}^{n}}$ has this time-homogeneous transition kernel and starts at $(0,0)$. Extend it past time 1 with the same kernel if necessary.
The limiting drift and covariance are $\boldsymbol{b}={(1,0)^{\top }}$ and $\boldsymbol{a}(z)=diag(0,{\tilde{\sigma }^{2}}(z))$. Expectations in the following estimates are over Z. Uniformly in z,
\[\begin{array}{c}\displaystyle n\mathbb{E}{H_{n}}(z)=\boldsymbol{b},\hspace{20.0pt}n\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{H_{n}}(z){H_{n}}{(z)^{\top }}\Bigr]=diag\Bigl(1/n,{\tilde{\sigma }^{2}}(z)\Bigr),\\ {} \displaystyle \mathbb{E}{\Bigl|{H_{n}}(z)\Bigr|^{4}}={n^{-4}}+2{\tilde{\sigma }^{2}}(z){n^{-3}}+3{\tilde{\sigma }^{4}}(z){n^{-2}}\le {C_{0}}{n^{-2}},\end{array}\]
where $|\cdot |$ is the Euclidean norm, ⊤ denotes transpose, and ${C_{0}}=1+2\overline{{\sigma ^{2}}}+3\overline{{\sigma ^{4}}}$. For the truncated coefficients
\[{\boldsymbol{b}_{n}}=n\mathbb{E}[{H_{n}}{\mathbf{1}_{\{|{H_{n}}|\le 1\}}}],\hspace{20.0pt}{\boldsymbol{a}_{n}}=n\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{H_{n}}{H_{n}^{\top }}{\mathbf{1}_{\{|{H_{n}}|\le 1\}}}\Bigr],\]
with their dependence on z suppressed, the fourth-moment bound gives
\[\sup \limits_{z}\Bigl|{\boldsymbol{b}_{n}}(z)-\boldsymbol{b}\Bigr|\le {C_{0}}/n,\hspace{20.0pt}\sup \limits_{z}\Bigl\|{\boldsymbol{a}_{n}}(z)-\boldsymbol{a}(z)\Bigr\|\le (1+{C_{0}})/n,\]
where $\|\cdot \|$ is the matrix operator norm. Moreover, for every $r\gt 0$,
\[\sup \limits_{z}n{\mu _{n}}\Bigl(z,\Bigl\{{z^{\prime }}:\Bigl|{z^{\prime }}-z\Bigr|\ge r\Bigr\}\Bigr)\le \frac{{C_{0}}}{n{r^{4}}}\longrightarrow 0.\]
Thus the coefficient limits and large-jump condition of the corollary hold. For smooth, compactly supported test functions $\varphi :{\mathbb{R}^{2}}\to \mathbb{R}$, the limiting generator is
\[\mathcal{A}\varphi (s,x)={\partial _{s}}\varphi (s,x)+\frac{1}{2}{\tilde{\sigma }^{2}}(s,x){\partial _{\mathit{xx}}}\varphi (s,x).\]
Its martingale problem is well-posed for every initial distribution: the stochastic differential equation (SDE) $d{T_{t}}=\mathit{dt}$, $d{Y_{t}}=\tilde{\sigma }({T_{t}},{Y_{t}})\hspace{1.67pt}d{B_{t}}$, where B is a standard one-dimensional Brownian motion, has bounded Lipschitz coefficients and a unique nonexplosive strong solution for every initial point. Also, a is continuous, symmetric and nonnegative definite, as required; nondegeneracy is not assumed in the corollary.
Write $D([0,1])$ for the space of real-valued right-continuous paths with left limits and $C([0,1])$ for its continuous-path subspace; ${\|v\|_{\mathrm{\infty }}}={\sup _{0\le t\le 1}}|v(t)|$. Corollary 7.4.2, applied with initial law the point mass at $(0,0)$, and projection onto the second coordinate therefore yield
\[{V_{t}^{n}}:={W_{\lfloor \mathit{nt}\rfloor /n}}\Longrightarrow X\hspace{10.0pt}\text{in}\hspace{2.5pt}D\Bigl([0,1]\Bigr)\hspace{2.5pt}\text{with the Skorokhod}\hspace{2.5pt}{J_{1}}\hspace{2.5pt}\text{topology},\]
where $d{X_{t}}=\sigma (t,{X_{t}})\hspace{1.67pt}d{B_{t}}$, ${X_{0}}=0$. Here ${T_{t}}=t$ for the limiting process, and restriction to $[0,1]$ is valid because its paths are continuous. Convergence on the left refers to the laws under ${\mathbb{Q}_{n}}$.
Define the linear interpolation by
\[{W_{t}^{n}}={W_{j/n}}+(\mathit{nt}-j)({W_{(j+1)/n}}-{W_{j/n}}),\hspace{20.0pt}j/n\le t\le (j+1)/n,\]
for $j=0,\dots ,n-1$. Then ${\|{W^{n}}-{V^{n}}\|_{\mathrm{\infty }}}\le {\max _{j\lt n}}|{W_{(j+1)/n}}-{W_{j/n}}|$, and, for every $r\gt 0$,
\[{\mathbb{Q}_{n}}\Bigl({\Bigl\|{W^{n}}-{V^{n}}\Bigr\|_{\mathrm{\infty }}}\gt r\Bigr)\le 2n\exp \Biggl(-\frac{n{r^{2}}}{2\overline{{\sigma ^{2}}}}\Biggr)\longrightarrow 0.\]
The perturbation theorem and continuity of X now give ${W^{n}}\Longrightarrow X$ in $C([0,1])$ with the uniform topology (see [2, Sections 3 and 12]).
Denote the probability governing X by P.
We also verify directly that
(8)
\[p:=\mathbf{P}\Biggl(\sup \limits_{0\le t\le 1}\Bigl|{X_{t}}-h(t)\Bigr|\lt \delta /2\Biggr)\gt 0.\]
Since h is continuous and piecewise linear, it is absolutely continuous with bounded derivative, defined almost everywhere. Set ${\theta _{t}}={h^{\prime }}(t)/\sigma (t,{X_{t}})$. The lower bound on σ implies $|{\theta _{t}}|\le {\|{h^{\prime }}\|_{\mathrm{\infty }}}/\underline{\sigma }$, so Novikov’s condition holds. Girsanov’s theorem gives a probability R, equivalent to P on the time interval $[0,1]$, with
\[\frac{d\mathbf{R}}{d\mathbf{P}}=\exp \Biggl({\int _{0}^{1}}{\theta _{s}}\hspace{1.67pt}d{B_{s}}-\frac{1}{2}{\int _{0}^{1}}{\theta _{s}^{2}}\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{ds}\Biggr),\hspace{20.0pt}{B_{t}^{\mathbf{R}}}={B_{t}}-{\int _{0}^{t}}{\theta _{s}}\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{ds}\]
a Brownian motion under R. Hence
\[\begin{array}{c}\displaystyle {M_{t}}:={X_{t}}-h(t)={\int _{0}^{t}}\sigma (s,{X_{s}})\hspace{1.67pt}d{B_{s}^{\mathbf{R}}},\\ {} \displaystyle {\langle M\rangle _{t}}={\int _{0}^{t}}{\sigma ^{2}}(s,{X_{s}})\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{ds}\le \overline{{\sigma ^{2}}},\hspace{20.0pt}0\le t\le 1.\end{array}\]
By the Dambis–Dubins–Schwarz theorem, on an extension if necessary, ${M_{t}}={\beta _{{\langle M\rangle _{t}}}}$ for a Brownian motion β. One may extend M after time 1 by an independent Brownian motion so that its quadratic variation tends to infinity. Therefore
\[\mathbf{R}\Biggl(\sup \limits_{0\le t\le 1}\Bigl|{X_{t}}-h(t)\Bigr|\lt \delta /2\Biggr)\ge \mathbf{R}\Biggl(\sup \limits_{0\le v\le \overline{{\sigma ^{2}}}}|{\beta _{v}}|\lt \delta /2\Biggr)\gt 0.\]
Here the final inequality is the standard positive probability that a Brownian motion remains in an open interval for a finite time. Equivalence of R and P proves (8). For these standard stochastic-calculus results, see [17, 18].
Finally the set $G=\{x\in C([0,1]):{\|x-h\|_{\mathrm{\infty }}}\lt \delta \}$ is open, and $\{{W^{n}}\in G\}\subseteq {E_{n}}$. The Portmanteau theorem gives
\[\liminf \limits_{n}{\mathbb{Q}_{n}}({E_{n}})\ge \liminf \limits_{n}{\mathbb{Q}_{n}}\Bigl({W^{n}}\in G\Bigr)\ge \mathbf{P}(X\in G)\ge p\gt 0.\]
It follows that
\[\liminf \limits_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{\mathbb{Q}_{n}}({E_{n}}\cap {F_{n}})\ge \liminf \limits_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\Bigl({\mathbb{Q}_{n}}({E_{n}})-{\mathbb{Q}_{n}}\Bigl({F_{n}^{c}}\Bigr)\Bigr)\ge p\gt 0.\]
Returning to the lower bound for $\mathbb{E}[{e^{n{S_{n}}}}]$, taking logarithms, dividing by n and using the Riemann-sum convergence, we obtain
\[\liminf \limits_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\frac{1}{n}\log \mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{n{S_{n}}}}\Bigr]\ge {\int _{0}^{1}}\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Bigl(t,h(t)\Bigr)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}-\epsilon \ge {\int _{0}^{1}}g(t)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}-2\epsilon .\]
Since $\epsilon \gt 0$ was arbitrary, this completes the proof. □
Remark 1.
It is natural to ask whether Theorem 1 can be extended to a multidimensional Brownian motion or to more general diffusion processes. Since the aim of this note is to focus on the one-dimensional case, we do not study these extensions here. A full treatment would require further analysis and is left for future research.
We also note that the financial interpretation of the result is limited to the Bachelier model, where the asset price can take negative values. Extending the present exponential utility approach to geometric Brownian motion is not straightforward. Indeed, the lognormal distribution does not have finite exponential moments for positive arguments. For this reason, the criterion used in this paper is not well suited to the geometric Brownian motion model. Such an extension would require a different functional and a different analytical approach.

3 Auxiliary lemmas

In this section, we prove two auxiliary results that were used in the proof of Theorem 1. We start with the following regularity result.
Lemma 1.
Let f satisfy the assumptions of Theorem 1. Then ${u_{\mathit{xx}}}$ and ${u_{t}}=-{u_{\mathit{xx}}}/2$ are Lipschitz continuous on $[0,1]\times \mathbb{R}$ with respect to the Euclidean metric.
Proof.
Set $A={\|{f^{\prime \prime }}\|_{\mathrm{\infty }}}\lt \mathrm{\infty }$ and let $K\ge 0$ be a Lipschitz constant for ${f^{\prime \prime \prime }}$. Taylor’s formula gives
\[{f^{\prime \prime }}(x+1)-{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)-{f^{\prime \prime \prime }}(x)={\int _{0}^{1}}\Bigl({f^{\prime \prime \prime }}(x+r)-{f^{\prime \prime \prime }}(x)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dr}.\]
Consequently,
\[\Bigl|{f^{\prime \prime \prime }}(x)\Bigr|\le 2A+K/2=:{B_{0}},\hspace{20.0pt}x\in \mathbb{R}.\]
This argument also covers $A=0$ and $K=0$, without division by either constant. The representations
\[q(t,x):={u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)=\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{f^{\prime \prime }}(x+{W_{1-t}})\Bigr],\hspace{20.0pt}{q_{x}}(t,x)=\mathbb{E}\Bigl[{f^{\prime \prime \prime }}(x+{W_{1-t}})\Bigr]\]
show that $|q(t,x)-q(t,y)|\le {B_{0}}|x-y|$ and that ${q_{x}}(t,\cdot )$ is K-Lipschitz. Hence, for every $z\in \mathbb{R}$,
\[\Bigl|q(t,x+z)-q(t,x)-{q_{x}}(t,x)z\Bigr|\le \frac{K}{2}{z^{2}}.\]
If $0\le s\lt t\le 1$, the heat-semigroup identity and a standard normal variable Z give
\[q(s,x)=\mathbb{E}\Bigl[q(t,x+\sqrt{t-s}\hspace{1.67pt}Z)\Bigr].\]
Using the remainder bound and $\mathbb{E}Z=0$, $\mathbb{E}{Z^{2}}=1$, we obtain
\[\Bigl|q(s,x)-q(t,x)\Bigr|\le \frac{K}{2}(t-s).\]
Thus, for arbitrary $(t,x)$, $(s,y)$,
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle \Bigl|q(t,x)-q(s,y)\Bigr|& \displaystyle \le {B_{0}}|x-y|+\frac{K}{2}|t-s|\\ {} & \displaystyle \le \sqrt{{B_{0}^{2}}+{K^{2}}/4}\sqrt{{|t-s|^{2}}+{|x-y|^{2}}}.\end{array}\]
The assertion for ${u_{t}}$ follows from the heat equation. □
Next, we prove the following.
Lemma 2.
Let f satisfy the assumptions of Theorem 1. For every $\epsilon \gt 0$, there exists a continuous, piecewise-linear function $h:[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}$, which depends on ϵ, such that $h(0)=0$ and
\[{\int _{0}^{1}}\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Bigl(t,h(t)\Bigr)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}\ge {\int _{0}^{1}}g(t)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}-\epsilon .\]
Proof.
Again, we notice that for the constant $a:={\sup _{x\in \mathbb{R}}}{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)\lt 1$, we have ${u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)\le a$ for all $(t,x)\in [0,1]\times \mathbb{R}$. Since the function Ψ is Lipschitz continuous on $(-\mathrm{\infty },a]$, Lemma 1 implies that $\Psi ({u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x))$ is Lipschitz continuous on $[0,1]\times \mathbb{R}$. Hence, g is also Lipschitz continuous.
Fix $\epsilon \gt 0$. By the uniform continuity of $\Psi ({u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x))$ and g, we may choose a partition $0={t_{0}}\lt {t_{1}}\lt \cdots \lt {t_{N}}=1$ and points ${x_{0}},\dots ,{x_{N-1}}\in \mathbb{R}$ such that the piecewise-constant function
\[\tilde{h}(t):={x_{i}},\hspace{20.0pt}t\in [{t_{i}},{t_{i+1}}),\hspace{20.0pt}\tilde{h}(1)={x_{N-1}}.\]
satisfies
(9)
\[{\int _{0}^{1}}\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Bigl(t,\tilde{h}(t)\Bigr)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}\ge {\int _{0}^{1}}g(t)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}-\frac{\epsilon }{2}.\]
Notice that for the constant $b:=\frac{1}{2}{\sup _{x\in \mathbb{R}}}|{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)|$, we have $|{u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)|\le 2b$ for all $(t,x)\in [0,1]\times \mathbb{R}$. Together with the relation ${u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)\le a$ for all $(t,x)\in [0,1]\times \mathbb{R}$, this yields $M:={\sup _{(t,x)\in [0,1]\times \mathbb{R}}}\Psi ({u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x))\lt \mathrm{\infty }$. Next, replace each jump of $\tilde{h}$ by a linear interpolation on sufficiently short disjoint intervals whose total length is less than $\frac{\epsilon }{8(1+M)}$ and, on an initial interval of length less than $\frac{\epsilon }{8(1+M)}$, interpolate linearly from 0 to ${x_{0}}$. In this way, we obtain a continuous, piecewise-linear function h satisfying $h(0)=0$, which differs from $\tilde{h}$ only on a set $A\subset [0,1]$ with $|A|\lt \frac{\epsilon }{4(1+M)}$. Set $h(1)={x_{N-1}}$. Therefore,
\[\Biggl|{\int _{0}^{1}}\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Bigl(t,h(t)\Bigr)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}-{\int _{0}^{1}}\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Bigl(t,\tilde{h}(t)\Bigr)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}\Biggr|\le 2M|A|\lt \frac{\epsilon }{2}.\]
This together with (9) gives
\[{\int _{0}^{1}}\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}\Bigl(t,h(t)\Bigr)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}\ge {\int _{0}^{1}}g(t)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}-\epsilon .\]
□

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments, which helped improve the paper.

References

[1] 
Bertsimas, D., Kogan, L., Lo, A.W.: When is time continuous? J. Financ. Econ. 55(2), 173–204 (2000). MR1886691. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812810663_0003
[2] 
Billingsley, P.: Convergence of Probability Measures, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York (1999). MR1700749. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316962
[3] 
Cai, J., Fukasawa, M., Rosenbaum, M., Tankov, P.: Optimal discretization of hedging strategies with directional views. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 7(1), 34–69 (2016). MR3461312. https://doi.org/10.1137/151004306
[4] 
Cohen, A., Dolinsky, Y.: A scaling limit for utility indifference prices in the discretised Bachelier model. Finance Stoch. 26(2), 335–358 (2022). MR4397933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-022-00473-y
[5] 
Dolinsky, Y., Zhang, X.: Scaling limits for exponential hedging in the Brownian framework. SIAM J. Control Optim. 64(2), 748–762 (2026). MR5054594. https://doi.org/10.1137/25M1737043
[6] 
Ethier, S.N., Kurtz, T.G.: Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence. Wiley (1986). MR0838085. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316658
[7] 
Fukasawa, M.: Discretization error of stochastic integrals. Ann. Appl. Probab. 21(4), 1436–1465 (2011). MR2857453. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-AAP730
[8] 
Fukasawa, M.: Efficient discretization of stochastic integrals. Finance Stoch. 18(1), 175–208 (2014). MR3146491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-013-0215-6
[9] 
Geiss, S.: Weighted BMO and discrete time hedging within the Black–Scholes model. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 132(1), 13–38 (2005). MR2136865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-004-0389-0
[10] 
Geiss, C., Geiss, S.: On an approximation problem for stochastic integrals where random time nets do not help. Stoch. Process. Appl. 116(3), 407–422 (2006). MR2199556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2005.10.002
[11] 
Geiss, S., Nguyen, T.: On Riemann–Liouville type operators, bounded mean oscillation, gradient estimates and approximation on the Wiener space. Stoch. Process. Appl. 187, 104651 (2025). MR4894808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2025.104651
[12] 
Geiss, S., Toivola, A.: Weak convergence of error processes in discretizations of stochastic integrals and Besov spaces. Bernoulli 15(4), 925–954 (2009). MR2597578. https://doi.org/10.3150/09-BEJ197
[13] 
Geiss, S., Toivola, A.: On fractional smoothness and ${L_{p}}$-approximation on the Gaussian space. Ann. Probab. 43(2), 605–638 (2015). MR3306001. https://doi.org/10.1214/13-AOP884
[14] 
Gobet, E., Makhlouf, A.: The tracking error rate of the delta-gamma hedging strategy. Math. Finance 22(2), 277–309 (2012). MR2897386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2010.00466.x
[15] 
Gobet, E., Temam, E.: Discrete time hedging errors for options with irregular payoffs. Finance Stoch. 5(3), 357–367 (2001). MR1849426. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013539
[16] 
Hayashi, T., Mykland, P.A.: Evaluating hedging errors: an asymptotic approach. Math. Finance 15(2), 309–343 (2005). MR2132193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0960-1627.2005.00221.x
[17] 
Karatzas, I., Shreve, S.E.: Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd ed. Springer (1991). MR1121940. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0949-2
[18] 
Revuz, D., Yor, M.: Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion, 3rd ed. Springer (1999). MR1725357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06400-9
Reading mode PDF XML

Table of contents
  • 1 Introduction and the main result
  • 2 Proof of Theorem 1
  • 3 Auxiliary lemmas
  • Acknowledgement
  • References

Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by VTeX.
by logo by logo
Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords
Brownian motion discretization of stochastic integrals scaling limits

MSC2020
60F10 60H05

Funding
Supported by the ISF grant 305/25.

Metrics
since March 2018
11

Article info
views

0

Full article
views

0

PDF
downloads

0

XML
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

  • Theorems
    1
Theorem 1.
Theorem 1.
Let $f\in {C^{3}}(\mathbb{R})$ be such that
\[-\mathrm{\infty }\lt \inf \limits_{x\in \mathbb{R}}{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)\le \sup \limits_{x\in \mathbb{R}}{f^{\prime \prime }}(x)\lt 1,\]
and suppose that ${f^{\prime \prime \prime }}$ is Lipschitz continuous.
Set
\[{S_{n}}:=f({W_{1}})-u(0,0)-{\sum \limits_{k=0}^{n-1}}{u_{x}}\Biggl(\frac{k}{n},{W_{\frac{k}{n}}}\Biggr)({W_{\frac{k+1}{n}}}-{W_{\frac{k}{n}}}),\hspace{20.0pt}n\in \mathbb{N},\]
and define $g:[0,1]\to {\mathbb{R}_{+}}$ by
\[g(t):=\sup \limits_{x\in \mathbb{R}}\Psi \Bigl({u_{\mathit{xx}}}(t,x)\Bigr).\]
Then g is a continuous function and
\[\lim \limits_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\frac{1}{n}\log \mathbb{E}\Bigl[{e^{\hspace{1.67pt}n{S_{n}}}}\Bigr]={\int _{0}^{1}}g(t)\hspace{1.67pt}\mathit{dt}.\]

MSTA

Journal

  • Online ISSN: 2351-6054
  • Print ISSN: 2351-6046
  • Copyright © 2018 VTeX

About

  • About journal
  • Indexed in
  • Editors-in-Chief

For contributors

  • Submit
  • OA Policy
  • Become a Peer-reviewer

Contact us

  • ejournals-vmsta@vtex.lt
  • Mokslininkų 2A
  • LT-08412 Vilnius
  • Lithuania
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy